La influencia del medio de comunicación sobre las respuestas afectivas de los grupos en función de la presión temporal percibida

Referencias bibliográficas

• Baltes, B. B., Dickson, M. W., Sherman, M. P., Bauer, C. C. y LaGanke, S. (2002). Computer-mediated communication and group decision making: A meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 87, 156-79.
• Bronner, R. (1982). Decision Making Under Time Pressure: An Experimental Study of Stress Behavior in Business Management. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
• Brown, T. M. y Miller, C. E. (2000). Communication networks in task-performing groups: Effects of task complexity, time pressure and interpersonal dominance. Small Groups Research, 31, 131-157.
• Burke, K., Aytes, K. y Chidambaram, L. (2001). Media effects on the development of cohesion and process satisfaction in computer-supported workgroups. An analysis of results from two longitudinal studies. Information Technology & People, 14, 122-141.
• Caballer, A., Gracia, F. y Peiró, J. M. (2005). Affective responses to work process and outcomes in virtual teams: Effects of communication media and time pres-sure. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 20, 245-260.
• Caplan, R. D. y Jones, K. W. (1975). Effects of workload, role ambiguity and type A personality and anxiety, depression and heartrate. Journal of Applied Psy-chology, 60, 713-719.
• Champoux, J. E. y Peters, W. S. (1987). Form, effect size and power in moderated regression. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 60,243-255.
• Chidambaram, L. y Jones, B. (1993). Impact of communication medium and com-puter support on group perceptions and performance: A comparison of face-to-face and dispersed meetings. MIS Quarterly, 17, 465-491.
• Cohen, J. y Cohen, P. (1983). Applied multiple regression/correlation analyses for the behavioural sciences. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
• Cronbach, L. (1987). Statistical test for moderator variables: Flaws in analysis recently proposed. Psychological Bulletin, 102, 414-417.
• Culnan, M.J. y Markus, M.L. (1987). Information technologies: Electronic media and interorganizational communication. En F.M. Jablin, L.L. Putnam, K.H. Roberts y L.W. Porter (Eds.), Handbook of Organizational Communication: An Interdisciplinary Perspective (pp. 420-433). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
• Cummings, L. L. y Bromiley, P. (1996). The Organizational Trust Inventory (OTI): Development and validation. En R.M. Kramer y T.R. Tyler (Eds.), Trust in organizations: frontiers of theory and research (pp. 302-330). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• Daft, R. L. y Lengel, R. H. (1984). Information richness: A new approach to ma-nagerial behavior and organizational design. Research in Organizational Beha-viour, 6, 191-233. Daft, R. L. y Lengel, R. H. (1986). A proposed integration among organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management Science, 32, 554-671.
• De Grada, E., Kruglanski, A. W., Mannetti, L. y Pierro, A. (1999). Motivated cognition and group interaction: Need for closure affects the contents and pro-cesses of collective negotiations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 346-365.
• Gibson, C. B. y Cohen, S. G. (2003). Virtual teams that work: Creating conditions for virtual team effectiveness. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
• Gracia, F. J., Arcos, J. L. y Caballer, A. (2000). Influencia de la presión temporal en el trabajo en grupo en función del tipo de tarea y del canal de comunicación. Psicothema, 12, 241-246.
• Gracia, F. J., Caballer, A. y Peiró, J. M. (2002). Efectos de la presión temporal sobre la cohesión grupal en diferentes tipos de tarea y en diferentes canales de comunicación. Psicothema, 14, 434-439.
• Hiltz, S. R. y Johnson, K. (1990). User satisfaction with computer-mediated com-munication systems. Management Science, 36, 739-764.
• Hiltz, S. R., Johnson K. y Turoff, M. (1986), Experiments in group decision mak-ing: Communication process and outcome in face-to-face versus computerized conferences. Human Communication Research, 13, 225-252.
• Hogg, M. A. y Hains, S. C. (1998). Friendship and group identification: A new look at the role of cohesiveness in groupthink. European Journal of Social Psy-chology, 28, 323-341.
• Hollingshead, A. B. (1998). Communication, learning, and retrieval in transactive memory systems. Journal of Experimental Social psychology, 34, 423-442.
• Hollingshead, A. B., McGrath, J. E. y O ́Connor, K. M. (1993). Group task per-formance and communication technology: A longitudinal study of computer mediated vs. face-to-face work groups. Small Group Research, 24, 307-333.
• Huang, W. W. (2003). Impact of GSS generic structures and task types on group communication process and outcome: Some expected and unexpected research findings. Behaviour and Information Technology, 22, 17-29.
• Jaccard, J., Turrisi, R. y Wan, C. K. (1990). Interaction effects in multiple regres-sion. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
• Jarvenpaa, S. L. y Leidner, D. E. (1999). Communication and trust in global virtual teams. Organization Science, 10, 791-815.
• Karau, S. J. y Kelly, J. R. (1992). The effects of time scarcity and time abundance on group performance quality and interaction process. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 28, 542-571.
• Kelly, J. R. y McGrath, J. E. (1985). Effects of time limits and task types on task performance and interaction of four-person groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 395-407.
• Kozlowski, S. y Bell, B. (2003). Work groups and teams in organizations. En Handbook of Psychology. Industrial and Organizational Psychology. John Wiley and sons.
• Lea, M., Spears, R. y Groot, D. (2001). Knowing me, knowing you: Anonymity effects on social identity processes within groups. Personality and Social Psy-chology Bulletin, 27, 526-537.
• Lester, S. W., Meglino, B. M. y Korsgaard, M. A. (2002). The antecedents and consequences of group potency: A longitudinal investigation of newly formed groups. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 352-368.
• Lindell, M. K. (2001). Assessing and testing interrater agreement on a single target using multi-item rating scales. Applied Psychological Measurement,25, 89-99.
• McGrath, J. E. (1984). Groups: Interaction and performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
• McGrath, J. E. y Hollingshead, A. B. (1993). Putting the group back in group support systems: Some theoretical issues about dynamic processes in groups with technological enhancements. En L.M. Jessup y J.S. Valacich (Eds.), Group support systems: New perspectives (pp. 78-96). New York: McMillan.
• McGrath, J. E. y Kelly, J. R. (1986). Time and human interaction. Toward a social psychology of time. New York: Guilford Press. Menecke, B. E., Valancich, J. S. y Wheeler, B. C. (2000). The effects of media and task on user performance: A test of the task-media fit hypothesis. Group Deci-sion and Negotiations, 9, 507-529.
• Mohrman, S. A, Cohen, S. G. y Mohrman, A. M. (1995). Designing team-based organizations: New forms for knowledge work. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
• Olson, G. M. y Olson, J. S. (2003). Human-computer interaction: Psychological aspects of the human use of computing. Annual Review of Psychology,54, 419-516.
• Pearce, J. L., Sommer, S. M., Morris, A. y Frideger, M. (1992). A Configurational Approach to Interpersonal Relations: Profiles of Workplace Social Relations and Task Interdependence. University of California, Irvine Working Paper No. GSM OB92015.
• Peiró, J. M., Prieto, F. y Zornoza, A. (1993). Nuevas tecnologías telemáticas y trabajo grupal: Una perspectiva psicosocial. Psicothema, 5,287-305.
• Porter, M. E. (1991). Toward a dynamic theory of strategy. Strategy Management Journal, 12, 92-117.
• Rodríguez, I., Bravo, M. J., Peiró, J. M. y Schaufeli, W. (2001). The Demands-Control-Support model, locus of control and its effect on job dissatisfaction: a longitudinal study. Work & Stress, 15, 97-114.
• Rousseau, D. M., Sitkin, S. B., Burt, R. S. y Camerer, C. (1998). Not so different after all: A cross-disciplinary view of trust. Academy of Management Review, 23, 393-404.
• Short, J. A., Williams, E. y Christie, B. (1976). The social psychology of telecom-munications. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
• Siegel, J., Dubrovsky, V., Kiesler, S. y McGuire, T. W. (1986). Group processes in computer-mediated communication. Organizational Behavior and Human De-cision Processes, 37, 157-187.
• Sproull, L. y Kriesler, S. (1986) Reducing social context cues: Electronic mail in organizational communication. Management Science, 31, 1492-1512.
• Straus, S. G. (1997). Technology, group process, and group outcomes: Testing the connections in computer-mediated and face-to-face groups. Human-Computer Interaction, 12,227-266.
• Straus, S. G. y McGrath, J. E. (1994). Does the medium matter? The interaction of task type and technology on group performance and member reaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 87-97.
• Thatcher, A. y De la Cour, A. (2003). Small group decision making in face-to-face and computer-mediated environments: The role of personality. Behaviour and Information Technology, 22, 203-218.
• Tuckman, B.W. (1965). Developmental sequence in small groups. Psychological Bulletin, 63, 384-399.
• Walther, J. B. (1995). Relational aspects of computer-mediated communication: Experimental observations over time. Organizational Science, 6, 186-203. Walther, J. B. (1996). Computer mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication Research, 23, 3-43.
• Witteman, H. (1991). Group member satisfaction: A conflict-related account. Small Group Research, 22,24-58.
• Wright, B. M., Barker, J. R., Cordery, J. L. y Maue, B. E. (2003). The ideal participative state: A prelude to work group effectiveness. Journal of Business and Management, 9, 171-188.
• Zornoza, A. M., Orengo, V., Gosálvez, I. y González, P. (2002). Teamwork in different communication contexts: A longitudinal study. Psychology in Spain, 6,41-55.
• Zornoza, A., Ripoll, P. y Peiró, J. M. (2002). Conflict management in groups that work in two different communication contexts: Face-to-face and computer-mediated communication. Small Group Research, 33, 481-508.