Nuevas tecnologías telemáticas y trabajo grupal. Una perspectiva psicosocial

Referencias bibliográficas

• Adrianson, L. y Hjelmquist, E. (1987). Group processes in face to face and computer mediated communication. Goteborg Psychological Reports, 17, 4.
• Adrianson, L. y Hjelmquiste, E. (1985). Shall group communication in two media: face to face communication and computer communication. Goteborg Psychological Reports, 15, 1-16.
• Andriessen, E. (1991). Mediated Communication and New Organizational Forms. En: C. L. Cooper y I. T, Robinson (eds.) International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Wiley.
• Andriessen, E. y Van den Velden, J. (1993). Teamwork supported by interaction technology. Comunicación presentada al Sixt European Congress on Work and Organizational Psychology (Organizado por la European Association of Work and Organizational Psychology). Alicante, 14-17 Abril.
• Applegate, L. M. (1986). Idea generation in organizational planning. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. University of Arizona.
• Bales, R. F. (1958). Task roles and social roles in problem solving groups. En: E. E. Maccoby, T. M. Newcomb, y E. L. Hartley, (eds.), Readings in Social Psychology. New York: Holt.
• Birrell, J. A. y White, P. N. (1982). Using technical intervention to behavioural advantage. Behaviour and Information Technology, 1, 3, 305-320.
• Burke, P. (1974). Participation and leadership in small groups. American Sociological Review, 39, 832-843.
• Computers (1985). Help Speed Law Firm's Billing. Office. 102, 170-171.
• Crawford, A. B. (1982). Corporate Electronic mail. A communication intensive application of information technology. MIS Quarterly, September, 1-13.
• Culnan, M. J. y Markus, M. L. (1987). Information technologies. En: F. M. Habling; L. L. Putnam; K. H. Roberts y Porter, L. W. (eds.). Handbook of organizational communication. Newbury Park: Sage.
• Champness, B. G. (1972). Feelings towards media in group situations. Communication studies group. Paper nº. E/72160/CH.
• Champness, B. G. y Davies, M. F. (1971). The Maier pilot experiment. Unpublished Communication Studies Group paper nº. E/710301/CH.
• Champness, B.G. y Reid, A. A. L. (1970). The efficiency of information transmission: A primary comparision between face to face meetings and the telephone. Unpublished Communications Studies Group paper nº. P/70240/CH.
• Chapanis, A.,Ochsman, R. B., Parrish, R. N. y Weeks, G. D. (1972). Studies in interactive communication: The effects of four communication modes on the behavior of teams during cooperative problems solving. Human Factors, 14, 487-509.
• Christie, B. (1973). An evaluation of the audiovideo conference system installed in the department of the environment. Unpublished Communications Studies Group paper n°. W/73360/CR.
• Christie, B. (1974). Semantic differential judgements of communications media and other concepts: Differences between the media. Unpublished communications Studies Group paper nº. E/74120/CR.
• Christie, B. y Dealberdi, M. (1985). Electronic meetings. En: Christie, B. (ed.): Human Factors of Information Technology in the office. New York: John Wiley y Sons.
• Christie, B. y Holloway, S. (1975). Factors affecting the use of telecommunications by management. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 48,3-9.
• Daft R. L., Lengel, R. H. y Trevino, L. K. (1987). Message equivocality media selection and manager performance: Implications for information systems. MIS Quarterly, 355-366, September.
• Davies, M. A. (1971). Communication effectiveness as a function of mode. Unpublished M.A. thesis University of Waterloo.
• DeSanctis, G. y Gallupe, R. B. (1987). A foundation for the study of Group decision support systems. Management Science. May, 33, 5, 589-609.
• Dutton, W., Fulk, J. y Steinfield, C. (1982). Utilization of Video conferencing. Telecommunication Policy. 6, 3, 164-178.
• Elton, M. y Carey, J. (1983). Computerizing Information: Consumer Reactions to teletext. Journal of Communication. 162-173.
• Fleenor, C. P. y Callahan, R. E. (1986). Computers on the job: Managing the human side. New York: Randon House.
• Fulk, J., Steinfield, C. W., Schrnitz, J. y Power, J. C. (1987). A social information processing. Model of media use in organizations. Communication Research, 14, 5, 529-552.
• Gallupe, R. B. (1985). The impact of task difficulty on the use of group decision support meetin. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Minnesota.
• Goldman, R. J. (1979). Factors influencing acceptance of telecommunications: A study of vocational rehabilitation practitioners. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. University of Southern California. Annenberg School of Communications.
• Grieve, S. y McCabe, B.G. (1986). E-mail use in the university department of communication. En: J. M. Hurd (ed.). Proceedings of the 49th Meeting of the American Society for Information Science, 23, 96-100.
• Hannan, J. (1983). The uncertain road to improved communication. Inforrn-systems. 5, 42-44.
• Heilbroon, M. y Libby, W. L. (1973). Comparative effects of technological and social inmediacy upon performance and perception during a two-person game. Paper read at the Annual Convention of the American Psychologica Association, Montreal.
• Hill, M. (1987). Bildschirn als geschaftsreise-Ersatz? Handelsblatt. v 13. 11.1987, 219.
• Hiltz, S. R. y Turoff, M. (1985). Structuring computer mediated communication systems to avoid information overload. Communications of the ACM, 28, 680-689.
• Hiltz, S. R., Johson, K. y Turoff. M. (1986). Experiments in group decision making, communication process and outcome in face to face vs. computerized conference. Human Communications Research, 113, 2, 225-252.
• Hiltz, S. R., Johson, K. y Turoff, M. (1990). Experiments in group decision making. Communication process and outcome in face to face vs. computerized conference. Human Communication Research. 13, 2, 225-252.
• Hiltz, S. R., Johson, K., Aronovitch, C. y Turoff, M. (1980). Face to face vs. computerized conference: A controlled experiment. Newark, N J : Computerized conferencing and communications center, NJIT Draft Report.
• Hiltz, S. R., Johson, K. y Turoff, M. (1978). The Network Nation: Human Communication via Computer. Reading, Mass: Adison Wesley Advanced Books.
• Huber, G. P. (1984). Issues in the desing of group decision support systems. MIS Quarterly, September.
• Huici, C. (1985). Estructura y procesos de grupo. (2 vol.). Madrid: UNED.
• Johansen, R. (1988). Groupware: Computer support for business teams. New York: The Free Press.
• Kerr, E. B. y Hiltz, S. R. (1982). Computer Mediated Communications Systems. Status and Evaluation. New York: Academic Press.
• Kiesler, S., Siegel, J. y McGuire, T. W. (1984). Social psychological aspects of computer mediated communication. American Psychologist. October. 1123-1134.
• Krueger, G. P. (1976). Teleconferencing in three communication modes as a function of the number of conferees. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. Johns Hopkins University.
• Kull, D. (1983). Electronic mail: Should computers carry your mail?. Computer Decisions, November, 164-184.
• Laplante, D. (1971). Communication friendliness. Trust and the Prisioners Dilems. M.A. Thesis University of Windsor.
• Leavitt, H. J. (1951). Some effects of certain communication patterns on group performance. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology. 46,38-50.
• Leplat, J. (1991). Organization of activity in collective tasks. En: Rasmussen, J: Brehmer, B; Leplat, J.(1991). Distributed Decision Making. Cognitive models for cooperative work. New York: John Wiley y sons.
• Leplat, J. y Savoyant, A. (1984). Ordonnancement et coordinationdes activities dans les travaux individuelles et collectifs. Bulletin de Psychologie, 1984.
• Levine, J. M., y Moreland, R. L. (1990). Progress in small group research. Annual Review Psychology. 41, 585-634.
• Lipinski, H., Spang, S. y Tydeman, J. (1980). Supporting task focussed communication. En: Communicating information: Proceedings of the 43rd ASIS, Annual Meeting .A. R. Benenfeld y E. J. Kazlauskas, (eds.) pp. 158-160. New York Knowledge Industry Publications, White Plains.
• Losey, C. L. (1985). Electronic messaging systems for more effective management. IEEE Transactions of Professional Communications. PC-28, 35-39.
• Manoochehri, G. H. (1985). Automation, job design and productivity of high volum office operations. J. of Systems Management. October, 14-19.
• Marvin, C. (1983). Telecommunications policy and the pleasure principle. Telecommunications policy. 7, 43-52.
• McGrath, J. E. (1984). Groups: Interaction and performance. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs.
• Mehrabian, A. (1972). Nonverbal Communication. Chicago: Aldine-Alberton.
• Mohr, L. (1971). Organizational technology and organizational structure. Administrative Science Quarterly. 16, 444-459.
• Morley, I. E. y Stephenson, G. M. (1969). Interpersonal and interparty exchange: a laboratory simulation of an industrial negatiation at the plant level. British Journal Psychology, 60, 543-545.
• Morley, I. E. y Stephenson, G. M. (1970). Formality in experimental negotiations: a validation study. British Journal Psychology, 61, 383.
• Noir, I. (1987). Videokonferenz-Die ganze welt in eigenen buro. Technik Heute, 9, 40-45.
• Nunamaker, J. F., Applegate, L. M. y Konsynski, B. R. (1987). Facilitating group creativity with GDSS. Journal of Management Information Systems (3:4), Spring, 5-19.
• Olson, M. H. y Lucas, H. C. (1982). The impact of office automation on the organization: Some implication for research and practice. Communications of the ACM, 25, 838-847.
• Orengo, V., Acin, C., Zornoza, A., Prieto, F. y J. M. Peiró, J. M. (1991). "Influencia de la estructura grupal, el clima grupal y, la asertividad sobre la conducta desinhibida, en la comunicación mediada por ordenador". Trabajo presentado en el III Congreso de Evaluación Psicológica. Barcelona, 25-28 Septiembre.
• Peiró, J. M. y Prieto, F. (en prensa). "Telematics and Organizational Structure and Processes. An Overwiew". En R. Roe y E. Andriessen (eds.) Holland: Lawrence Erlbaum.
• Peiró, J. M., Prieto, F. y Zomoza, A. (1990). 'Issues of Communication in electronic cooperation". Paper presented at the special session on telematics at work. International Conference on "Computer, man and Organization". Nivelles. Belgium 9-11 May.
• Peiró, J, M., Prieto, F., Zornoza, A., Martí, C., Marín, F., Acín, C., Osca, A. y Ramos, J. (1991). "New communication technologies and their influence on work group". Comunicación presentada al 5° European Congress of Work and Organizational Psychology (Organizado por la European Association on Work and Organizational Psychology). Rouen. 24-27 Marzo.
• Picot, A., Klingenber, H. y Kranzle, H.P. (1982). Office Technology: A Report on Attitudes and Channel Selection from Field Studies in Germany', in Communication Yearbook , (ed. M. Burgoon). 6 (pp. 674-692) Beverly Hills: Sage Pub.
• Poole, M. S. y DeSanctis (1989). Use of GDSS as an appropiation process. Proceedings of the 22nd annual Human International Conference on System Sciences. Vol IV, 149-157.
• Rasmussen, J., Brehmer, B., Leplat, J. (1991). Distributed Decision Making. Cognitive models for cooperative work. New York: John Wiley y Sons.
• Reinhard, R. (1990). Videoconferencing and bargaining: A preliminary laboratory experiment. Paper prepared for Workshop on "Telematics and work", 13-15 April, Bad Hamburg.
• Rice, R. E. y Baird, J. (1983). Conceptual role of new communcation technology in organization productivity. En: R. Vondran et. al, (eds.). Productivity in the information age. ASIS Proceeding. 20.
• Rice, R. E. y Case, D. (1983). Computer-based messaging in the university: A description of use and utility. J. of Comrnunication, 33, 131-152.
• Roe, R. (1989). Reflections en Telematics and Work. En: Andriessen.E y Roe, R. Telematics and Work. (En prensa).
• Rogers, E. M. y Agarwala-Rogers, R. (1976). Communications and organizations. New York: Free Press.
• Safayeni, F., Lee, E. y Maccgregor, J. (1988). An empirical investigation of two electronic mail systems. Behaviour and Information Technology, 7, 4, 361-372.
• Schaefermeyer, M. J. y Sewell, E. H. (1988). Communicating by electronic mail. American Bahavioural Scientist, 32, 2, 112-133.
• Shane, B. (1979). Open and rigid communication networks: A reevaluation by simulation. Small Group behavior, 10, 2, 242-262.
• Shaw, M. E. (1981). Group dynamics: The social psychology of small group behaviour. Third edition. New York: McGraw Hill.
• Sheffield, B. (1985). Office automation in practice. Data processing in business and industry. Mars. 18-20.
• Short, J., Williams, E. y Christie, B. (1976). The social psychology of Telecommunications. London: John Wiley y Sons.
• Short, J. A. (1973). The effects of medium of communication en persuasion, bargaining and perceptions of the other. Unpublished Communication Studies Group papen n°. E/73100/SH.
• Shulman, A. y Steinman, J. (1978). Interpersonal teleconferencing in an organizational context. En: Elton, M; Lucasa, W. y Conrath. D. (Eds.) Evaluating New Telecommunication Services, 399-424. New York: Plenum Press.
• Siegel, J., Dubrovsky, V., Kiesler, S. y McGuire, T. (1983). Group processes in computen mediated communications. Manuscript submitted for publication.
• Siegel, J., Dubrovsky, V., Kiesler, S. y McGuire, T. W. (1986). Group processes in computer mediated communication. Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, 37, 157-187.
• Sims, H. (1982). Commentary en Kiesler, Siegel and McGuire. Stanford.CA. Stanford Unirersity Department of Psychology.
• Steinfield, C. W. (1983). Communicating via electronic mail: Patterns and predictors of use in organizations. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Southern California.
• Steinfield, C. W. (1986a). Computer mediated communication in an organizational setting: Explaining task related and socio-emocional use . En: M.L. McLaughlin (Ed.). Communication Yearbook, 9, 777-805.
• Svenning, L. y Ruchinskas, J. (1981). Predicting the use of video-conferencing: Variations by levels and jobs. Paper presented at the International Communication Association, Minneapolis. May.
• Svenning, L. (1982). Predispositions toward a telecommunications innovation: The influence of individual, contextual and innovation factors on attitudes, intentions and projections toward viedo-conferencing. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Southern California. Artnenberg School of Communications.
• Taylor, J. R. (1982). Computer aided message systems: An organizational perspective. Office Information Systems, N. Naffah (ed.). Amsterdam, North Holland.
• Turoff, M. y Hiltz, S. R. (1982). The electronic journal: A progress report. J. of the American Sicety for Information Sci. 33,195-202.
• Turoff, M., Hiltz, S. R. y Bahgata, A., N. F. (1989). Distributed group decision support systems and computer mediated communication systems. MIS Quarterly, (en prensa).
• Tydeman, J., Lipinski, H. y Spang, S. (1980). An interactive computer based approach to aid group problem formulation. Technol. Forecasting Soc. Change, 16, 311-320.
• Utterback, J. (1974). Innovation in industry and the diffusion of technology. Science, 183,620-626.
• Vallee, J., Johansen, R., Randolph, R. H. y HASTINGS, C. (1974). Group communication through computers: Study of social effects. San Francisco: Institute for the Future, 2, R-33.
• Watson, R., DeSanctis, G. y Poole, M. S. (1988). Using a GDSS to facilitate group consensus: some intended and unintended consequences. MIS Quarterly (12:3). September, 63-478.
• Wellens, A, R. (1986). Use of psychological distancing model to assess differences in telecommunication media, En: Parker, L. and Olgen, C. (Eds.). Telefonferencing and electronic media (5), Madison: Center for Interactive Programs.
• Wichman, H. (1970). Effects of isolation and communication on cooperation in a two person game. J. Per. Soc. Psychology. 16,114-120.
• Williams, E. (1974). A summary of the Present State of Knowledge Regarding the Effectiveness of the Substitution of Face to face Meetings by Telecommunications Meetings: Type Allocation Revisited. Unpublished Communications Studies Group. Paper nº P/74294/WL.
• Williams, E. (1975a). Medium or message: Communication medium as a determinant of interpersonal evaluation. Sociometry. 38, 119-130.
• Williams, E. (1975a). The effectiveness of person to person telecommunication systems research at the communication studies group (University College, Long range research, Report 3, Reference no. LRRR 003:1TF). Available from Communication Studies group. Wates House. 22. Gordon Street, London. WCIH OQB, England.
• Zigurs, I. (1987). The effect of computer based support on influence, attempts and patterns in small group decision making. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. University of Minnesota, MN
• Zornoza, A., Prieto, F., Peiró, J. M., Marín, F., Acin, C., Orengo, V., Martí, C. y Solanes, A. (1992) "El proceso grupal desde la perspectiva de la gestión del conflicto: incidencia del canal de comunicación". Trabajo presentado en el Congreso Iberoamericano de Psicología, Madrid, 6-10 Julio.
• Zornoza, A., Prieto, F., Peiró, J. M., Marín, F., Acin, C., Orengo, V., Martí, C. y Rodríguez, J. L, (1992) "Influencia del conocimiento previo, el clima grupal y la asertividad sobre la conducta desinhibida. A través de tres medios de comunicación". Trabajo presentado en el Congreso Iberoamericano de Psicología. Madrid, 6-10 Julio.
• Zornoza, A., Prieto, F., Martí, C. y Peiró, J. M. (1993). "Group productivity and telematic communication". Comunicación presentada al Sixt European Congress on Work and Organizational Psychology (Organizado por la European Association of Work and Organizational Psychology). Alicante, 14-17 Abril.
• Zornoza, A., Prieto, F., Orengo,V., Acin, C., Peiró, J. M. y Martí, C. (en prensa) "Influencia del conocimiento previo, el clima grupal y la asertividad sobre la conducta desinhibida, en la comunicación mediada por ordenador". Evaluación Psicológica, Reading.
• Zornoza, A. (1992). La toma de decisiones en grupo. Efectos diferenciales del canal de comunicación sobre el rendimiento grupal. Tesis doctoral, Octubre, Valencia.