Sobre la relación entre la ergonomía y psicología cognitivas

  1. Cañas, José Juan
  2. Fajardo, Inmaculada
  3. Salmerón González, Ladislao
Revista:
Anuario de psicología

ISSN: 0066-5126

Ano de publicación: 2004

Título do exemplar: Psicología y ergonomía

Volume: 35

Número: 4

Páxinas: 507-520

Tipo: Artigo

Outras publicacións en: Anuario de psicología

Resumo

En el presente trabajo se describe el ámbito y el modo de trabajo de la ergonomía cognitiva, para a continuación ahondar en la relación entre la ergonomía y la psicología cognitiva. En este sentido, se discute la visión extendida em el ámbito científico que concibe a la ergonomía cognitiva como simple ciencia aplicada de la psicología cognitiva. Para contrarrestar esta visión se defiende el papel de la ergonomía cognitiva como conceptual sobre el trabajo del ergónomo cognitivo con el objetivo de facilitar el desarrollo de líneas de investigación conjuntas entre la ergonomía y psicologías cognitivas.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Baccino, T. & Colombi, T. (2001). L'analyse des mouvements des yeux sur le web. En A. VomHofe (Ed.), Les interactions homme-système: perspectives et recherches psycho-ergonomiques (pp. 127-148). Paris: Hermès.
  • Cañas, J. J., Bajo, M. T. & Gonzalvo, P. (1994). Mental models and computer programming. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 40, 795-811.
  • Cañas, J. J., Salmerón, L. & Fajardo, I. (En prensa). Toward the analysis of the interaction in the joint cognitive system. En A. Pirhonen, H. Isomäki, C. Roast & P. Saariluoma (Eds.), Future interaction design. London: Springer-Verlag.
  • Cañas, J. y Wærn, Y. (2001). Ergonomía cognitiva. Aspectos psicológicos de la interacción de las personas con la tecnología de la información. Madrid: Editorial Médica Panamericana.
  • Carroll, J. M. (1991). The kittle house manifesto. En J. M. Carroll (Ed.), Designing interaction: Psychology at the human-computer interface (pp. 1-16). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Dillon, A. & Gabbard, R. (1998). Hypermedia as an educational technology: A review of the quantitative research literature on learner comprehension, control, and style. Review of Educational Research, 68, 322-349.
  • diSessa, A. A. (1991). Local sciences: viewing the design of human-computer systems as cognitive science. En J. M. Carroll (Ed.), Designing interaction: Psychology at the human-computer interface (pp. 162-202). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Doel, van den, K. & Pai, D. K. (1998). The sounds of physical shape. Presence, 7 (4), 382-395. CA, 151-158.
  • Dumais, S. T., Furnas, G. W., Landauer, T. K. & Deerwester, S. (1988). Using latent semantic analysis to improve information retrieval. En Proceedings de CHI'88: Conference on Human Factors in Computing, New York: ACM, 281-285.
  • Endsley, M. R. (1991. Situation awareness in dynamic systems. En Y. Queinnec & F. Daniellou (Eds.), Designing for Everyone (pp. 801-803). London: Taylor and Francis.
  • Garner, W. R. (1972). The acquisition and application of knowledge: A symbiotic relationship. American Psychologist, 27, 941-946.
  • Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
  • Hendrick, H. (1997). Organizational design and macroergonomics. En G. Salvendy (Ed.), Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics (pp. 594-636). New York: Wiley-Interscience.
  • Huguenard, B. R., Lerch, F. J., Junker, B. W., Patz, R. J. & Kass, R. E. (1997). Working-Memory Failure in Phone-Based Interaction. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 4, 67-102.
  • Kantowitz, B. H. (1982). Interfacing human information processing and engineering psychology. En W. C. Howell & E. A. Fleishman (Eds.), Human performance and productivity (Vol. 2): Information processing and decision making. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Kirlik, A. (1995). Requirements for psychological models to support design: Toward ecological task analysis. En J. M. Flach & P. A. Hancock (Eds.), Global perspectives on the ecology of human-machine systems, Vol. 1 (pp. 68-120). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Landauer, T. K. (1987). Relations between cognitive psychology and computer system design. En J. M. Carroll (Ed.), Interfacing thought. Cognitive aspects of human-computer interaction (pp. 1-25). Cambridge: MIT Press.
  • Landauer, T. K. (1991). Let's get real: A position paper on the role of cognitive psychology in the design of humanly useful and usable systems. En J. M. Carroll (Ed.), Designing interaction: Psychology at the human-computer interface (pp. 60-73). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Landauer, T. K. & Dumais, S. T.(1997). A solution to plato's problem: The latent semantic analysis theory of acquisition, induction and representation of knowledge. Psychological Review, 104, 211-240.
  • Lansdale, M. (1998). Modeling memory for absolute location. Psychological Review, 105, 351-378.
  • Lansdale, M. & Cotes, E. (1999). Analysing uncertainty in location memory: Issues in the design of spatial database systems. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 13, 237-256.
  • Lansdale, M., Scrivener, S. & Woodcock, A. (1996). Developing practice with theory in HCI: Applying models of spatial cognition for the design of pictorial databases. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 44, 777-799.
  • Lederman, S. J., Klatzky, R. L., Morgan, T. & Hamilton, C. (2002). Integrated multimodal information about surface texture via a probe: relative contributions of haptic and touch-produced sound sources. Proceedings, Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems, Orlando, FL, 97-104.
  • Lederman, S. J., Martin, A. M., Tong, C. & Klatzky, R. L. (2003). Relative performance using haptic and/or touch-produced auditory cues in a remote absolute texture identification task. Proceedings, Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems Teleoperator Systems, Los Angeles, CA, 151-158.
  • Newell, A. & Simon, H. A. (1972). Human Problem Solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Norman, D. A. (1986). Cognitive engineering. En D. A. Norman & S. W. Draper (Eds.), User Centred System Design (pp. 32-65). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Norman, D. A. (1991). Cognitive Artifacts. En J. M. Carroll (Ed.), Designing interactions: psychology at the human-computer interactions (pp. 17-38). New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Paris, C. R., Salas, E. & Cannon-Bowers, A. (1999). Human Performance in Multi-Operator Systems. En P. A. Hancock (Ed.), Human Performance and Ergonomics (pp. 329-386). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
  • Pollitzer, E. & Edmonds, E. (1996). Editorial: the evolving partnership between cognitive science and HCI. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 44, 731-741.
  • Reason, J. (1990). Human error. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Roscoe, S. (1997). The adolescence of Engineering Psychology. En S. M. Casey (Ed.), Human Factors History Monograph Series, vol 1.
  • Simon, H. (1969). The Science of the Artificial. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Stanney, K. M., Maxey, J. L. & Salvendy, G. (1997). En G. Salvendy (Ed.), Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics (pp. 637-656). New York: Wiley-Interscience.
  • Unz, D. C. & Hesse, F. W. (1999). The use of hypertext for learning. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 20, 279-295.
  • Wærn, Y. y Hägglund, S. (1997). User aspects of knowledge base systems. En M. G. Helander, T. K. Landauer & P. Prabhu (Eds.), Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction, 2nd edition. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier Science.
  • Wickens, C. D. (1992). Engineering psychology and human performance. New York: Harper Collins.
  • Zacks, J. M. & Tversky, B. (2003). Structuring information interfaces for procedural learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 9, 88-100.