La innovación tecnológica como proceso de cambio organizacional

Referencias bibliográficas

• Abrahamson, E. (1991). Managerial fads and fashions: The diffusion and rejection of innovations. Academy of Manage ment Review, 16(3), 586-612.
• Alsop, A. (1996). Innovation and Psychology: Themes and Research Funding. European Journal of Work and Organiza tional Psychology, 5(1), 149-153.
• Anderson, N.R. (1990). Work group innovation: Current research concerns and future directions. Communicación presentada al Fourth West European Congress on the Psychology of Work and Organization, Cambridge, Abril (1989).
• Anderson, N.R. y King, N. (1991). Managing innovation in organiztions. Lea dership and Organizational Development Journal, 12, 17-21.
• Anderson, N.R. y King, N. (1993). Innovation in Organizations. En Cooper, C.L. y Robertson, I.T. (Eds.), International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychlogy, vol. 8(1-34). Londres: Wiley.
• Anderswon, P. y Tushman, M.L. (1990). Technological Discontinuites and Dominant Designs: A Ciclycal Model of Technological Change. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 604-633.
• Attewell, P. (1992). Technolgy diffusion and organizational learning: the case of business computing. Organizationa Science, 3, 1-19.
• Bamberger, P. (1991). Reinventing Innovation Theory: Critical issues in the conceptualization, measurement, and analysis of technological innovation. Rese arch in the Sociology of Organizations, 9, 265-294.
• Barley, S. (1986). Technology as an occasion for structuring: evidence from observation of CT scanners and the social order of radiology departments. A d m i n i s trative Science Quarterly, 31, 78-108.
• Blacker, F. y Brown, C. (1986). Alter- native modes to guide the design and introduction of the new information technologies into work organizations. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 59, 287-313.
• Blas, F. (1998). Una organización de la teoría organizacional. Revista de Psicolo gía del Trabajo y de las Organizaciones, 14(1), 9-31.
• Bowen, R.; De Wisch, J. y Steyaert, C. (1992). Innovation projects in organizations: complementing the dominant logic by organizational learning. En Hosking, D.M. y Anderson, N. (Eds.), Organizatio nal change and innovation. Psychological perspectives and practices in Europe (123- 148). London: Routledge.
• Braverman, H. (1974). Labor and monopoly capital . New York: Monthly Review Press.
• Burris, B.H. (1989). Technocratic organization and control. Organizational Stu dies, 10(1), 1-22.
• Chambel, M.J.; Peiró, J.M. y Prata, P. (1999). El modelo "AMIGO" en el análisis del cambio estratégico en las organizaciones: ocho estudios de casos realizados en pequeñas empresas del sector cerámico. Estudios Financieros Recursos Humanos, 199, 199-240.
• Cheng, Y.T. y Van de Ven, A.H. (1996). Learning the Innovation Journey: Order out of Chaos?. O r g a n i z a t i o n Science, 7(6), 593-614.
• Clegg, S.R. y Hardy, C. (1996). Introduction. Organizations, Organization and Organizing. En Glegg, S.R.; Hardy, C. y Nord, W.R. (Eds.),Handbook of Organiza tion Studies (1-28). London: Sage Publications.
• Conde, J.; de la Torre, A. y Vega, M.T. (2001). Perception of job security in a process of technological change: Its influence on psychological well-being. B e h a v i o u r and Information Technology, 20, 3, 213- 223.
• Cooper, R.B. y Zmud, R.W. (1990). Information technolgoy implementation research: A technological diffusion approach. Management Science, 36, 123-129.
• Daft, R.L. (1978). A dual-core model of organizational innovation. Academy of Management Journal, 21, 193-210.
• Daft, R.L. y Becker, S.W. (1978). Inno vation in Organizations. New York: Elsevier North-Holland.
• Damanpour, F. (1987). The adoption of technological, administrative, and ancillary innovations: Impact of organizational factors. Journal of Management, 13, 675-688.
• Damanpour, F. (1991). Organizational innovation: A Meta-analisis of effects of determinants and moderators. Academy of Management Journal, 34(3), 555-590.
• Damanpour, F. (1992). Organizational Size and Innovation. Organizational Stu dies, 13(3), 375-402.
• Damapour, F. y Evan, W.M. ( 1 9 8 4 ) . Organizational innovation and performance: the problem of "organizational lag". Administrative Science Quarterly, 29, 392- 409.
• Davis, D.D. (1995). Form, Function, and Strategy in Boundaryless Organizations. En: Howard, A. (Ed.), The changing nature of work (112-138). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
• Davis, L.E. y Taylor, J.C. (1976). Technology, organization and job structures. En Dubin, R. (Ed), Handbook of work, orga nization and society. Chicago IL: Rand McNally.
• De la Torre, A. y Conde, J. (1997). Cambio tecnológico: factores críticos y preventivos en el comportamiento laboral. Revista de Psicología del Trabajo y de las Organizaciones, 13(1), 51-64.
• De la Torre, A. y Conde, J. (1998). El desafío del cambio tecnológico. Hacia una nueva organización del trabajo. Madrid: Ed. Tecnos.
• Dosi, G. (1982). Technological paradigms and technological trajectories: A suggested interpretation of the determinants and directions of technical change. Research Policy, 11, 147-162.
• Downs, G.W. y Mohr, L.B. (1976). Toward a theory of innovation. A d m i n i s trative Science Quarterly, 21, 700-714.
• Dvash, A. y Mannheim, B. (2001). Technological coupling, job characteristics and operators’ well-being as moderated by desirability of control. Behavior and Infor mation technology, 20, 3, 225-236.
• Eijnatten, F.M.; Hoevenaars, A.M. y Rutte, C.G. (1992). En Hosking, D.M. y Anderson, N. (Eds.), O r g a n i z a t i o n a l Change and Innovation. Psychological perspectives and practices in Europa (183- 207). London: Routledge.
• Ellul, J. (1974). The Technological Society. New York: Alfred Knopf.
• Ettlie, J.E. (1980). Adequacy of stage models for decisions on adoption of innovation. Psychological Reports, 46, 991- 995
• Ettlie, J.E.; Bridges, W.P. y O'Keefe, R.D. (1984). Organization strategy and structural differences for radical versus incremental innovation. M a n a g e m e n t Science, 30, 682-695.
• Fox, A. (1973). Industrial relations: A social critique of pluralist ideology. En Child, J. (Ed.), Man and Organisation. London: Allen & Unwin.
• Friedman, A.L. (1994). The Information technology field: Using fields and paradigms for analyzing technological change. Human Relations, 47(4), 367-392.
• Frost, P.J. y Egri, C.E. (1991). The political process of innovation. Research in Organizational Behavior, 13, 229-295.
• Georgiou, P. (1973). The Goald Paradigm and Notes Towards a Coenter Paradigm. Administrative Science Quartely, 18, 291-310.
• Gerwin, D. (1988). A theory of radical innovation process for computer-aided manufacturing technology. IEEE Transac tions on Engineering Managemet, 35, 90- 100.
• Hage, J. y Aiken, M. (1970). S o c i a l Change in Complex Organizations. New York: Random House.
• Harvey, E. y Mills, R. (1970). Patterns of organizational adaptation: A political perspective. En M.N. Zald (Ed.), Power in O r g a n i z a t i o n s. Nashville: Vanerbilt University Press.
• Heller, F. (1997). Sociotechnology and the environment. Human Relations, 50, 605-624.
• Heller, F. (1998). The levers of Organizational Change: Facilitators and Inhibitors. En Drenth, P.J.D.; Thierry, H. y de Wolff, C.J. (Eds.), Handbook of Work and Organizational Psychology, vol. 4. (229- 252). Hove UK: Psychology Press.
• Hosking, D.M. y Anderson, N. (1992). Organizational change and innovation. En Hosking, D.M. y Anderson, N. (Eds.), Organizational change and innovation. Psychological perspectives and practices in Europe (1-15). London: Routledge.
• Hunt, R.G. (1972). The Restless Orga nization. Wiley International.
• Kanter, R. (1983). The Change Masters. New York: Simon & Schuster.
• Kanter, R. (1988). When a Thousand Flowers Bloom: Structural, Collective and Social Conditions for Innovations in Organization. En Staw, B.M. y Cummings, L.L. (Eds)., Research in Organizational Beha vior, vol. 10. Greenwich, CT.: JAI Press.
• Kimberly, J.F.; Renshaw, L.R.; Schwartz, J.S.; Hillman, A.L.; Pauly, M.V. y Teplensky, J.D. (1990). Rethinking organizational innovation. En West, M.A. y Farr, J.L. (Eds.), Innovation and Creativity at work. Psychological and Organizational Strategies (163-178). Chichestey: Willey.
• Kimberly, J.R. (1981). Managerial Innovation. En Nyström, P.C. y Starbuck, W.H. (Eds.), Handbook of Organizational D e s i g n vol.1(84-104). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Kimberly, J.R. (1986). The organizational context of technological innovation. En Davis, D.D. (Ed.), Managing Technologi cal innovation (23-43). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
• Kimberly, J.R. y Evanisko, M. (1981). Organizational Innovation: The influence of individual, organizational, and contex- tual factors on hospital adoption of technological and administrtive innovations. Aca demy of Management Journal , 24, 689-713.
• King, N. (1990). Innovation at work: The research literature. En West, M.A. y Farr, J.L. (Eds.), Innovation and Creativity at work. Psychological and Organizational Strategies (15-59). Chichestey: Willey.
• King, N. y Anderson, N. (1995). I n n o vation and Change in Organizations. New York: Routledge.
• Kolodny, H.; Liu, M.; Stymne, B. y Denis, H. (1996). New Technology and the Emerging Organizational Paradigm. Human Relations, 49(12), 1457-1487.
• Koopman, P.L. (1991). Between control and commitment: Management and Change as the art of balancing. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 12, 5, 3-7.
• Koopman, P.L. y Algera, J.A. (1998). Automation: Socio-organizational Aspects. En Drenth, P.J.D.; Thierry, H. y de Wolff, C.J. (Eds.), Handbook of Work and Orga nizational Psychology, vol. 4 (429-460). Hove UK: Psychology Press.
• Lewis, L.K. y Seibold, D.R. (1993). Innovation modification during intraorganizational adoption. Academy of Manage ment Review, 18(2), 322-354.
• Majchrzak, A. y Borys, B. (1998). Computer-aided technology and work: Moving the field forward. En Cooper, C.L. y Robertson, I.T. (Eds.), International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, vol. 13 (305-354). Londres: Wiley.
• Markus, M.L. y Robey, D. (1988). Information Technology and Organizational Change: Causal Structure in Theory and Research. Management Science, 34(5), 583-598.
• Martín, P. (1995). Autonomía en el puesto de trabajo y búsqueda de oportuni dades de innovación durante la fase de e n t r a d a. Tesis de licenciatura. Universitat de València.
• Martín, P.; Orengo, V. y Martínez, I. (1997). Innovación y creatividad organizacionales: perspectivas de análisis. R e v i s t a de Psicología del Trabajo y de las Organi zaciones, 13(1), 99-118.
• Meyer, A.D. y Goes, J.B. (1988). Organizational assimilation of innovations: a multinivel contextual analysis. Academy of Management Journal, 31, 897-923.
• Mohr, L.B. (1982). Explaining Organi zational Behavior. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
• Morgan, G. (1990). Imagenes de la Organización. Madrid: Ed. Ra-ma. Traducción del original "Images of Organizations", Beverly Hills, Sage, 1986.
• Mumford, E. (1983). Participative systems design: Practice and theory. J o u r n a l of Occupational Behaviour, 4, 47-57.
• Munduate, L. (1992). Psicosociología de las relaciones laborales. Barcelona: PPU.
• Myers, S. y Marquis, D.G. (1969). Suc cessful industrial innovations (NSF 69- 17). National Science Foundation.
• Nelkin, D. (1973). Methodone Mainte nance: A Technological Fix. New York, George Braziller.
• Orengo, V.; Martín, P.; Carrero, V.; Prieto, F. y Peiró, J.M. (2001). Estrategías de implantación de nuevas tecnologías. En M. Salanova, R. Grau y J.M. Peiró (Eds.), Nuevas tecnologías y formación continua en la empresa. Un estudio psicoso c i a l. Castellón: Publicacions de la Universitat Jaume I.
• Orlikowski, W.J. (1992). The duality of technology: Rethinking the concept of technology in organizations. O r g a n i z a t i o n Science, 3(2), 398-427.
• Osterman, P. (1991). The impact of IT on jobs and skills. En Scott Morton, M.S. (Ed.), The corporation of the 1990s: Infor mation technology and organizational t r a n s f o r m a t i o n. New Yokr: Oxford University Press.
• Peiró, J.M. (1990). Organizaciones. Nuevas perspectivas psicosociológicas. Barcelona: PPU.
• Peiró, J.M. (1999). El modelo "Amigo": marco contextualizador del desarrollo y la gestión de recursos humanos en la organización. Papeles del Psicólogo, 72, 3-15.
• Pfeffer, J. (1982). Organizations and Organizational Theory. Cambridge, M.A.: Ballinger.
• Pierce, J.L. y Delbecq, A.L. (1977). Organization structure, individual attitudes and innovation. Academy of Management Review, 2, 27-37.
• Porter, L.W.; Lawer, E.E. y Hackman, J.R. (1975). Behavior in organizations . New York: McGraw Hill Book Co.
• Prieto, F.; Zornoza, A. y Peiró, J.M. (1997). Nuevas tecnologías de la informa ción en la empresa. Una perspectiva psi cosocial. Madrid: Pirámide.
• Prieto, F.; Zornoza, A.; Orengo, V. y Peiró, J.M. (1996). Trabajo y nuevas tecnologías de la información. En Peiró, J.M. y Prieto, F. (Dirs.), Tratado de Psicología del Trabajo. Actividad laboral en su contexto, vol. 1 (93-123). Madrid: Ed. Síntesis.
• Roberts, K.H. y Grabowski, M. (1996). Organizations, Technology and Structuring. En Clegg, S.R., Hardy, C. y Nord, W.R. (Eds.), Handbook of Organizational Studies, (409-423). London: Sage.
• Rogers, E. M. (1983). Difusión de las innovaciones. 3ª edición, New York: Free Press.
• Salanova, M.; Grau, R.; Cifre, E. y Llorens, S. (2000). Computer training, frequency of usage and burnout: The moderating role of computer sel-efficacy. Computers in Human Behavior, 16, 575- 590.
• Salanova, M. y Schaufeli, W.B. (2000). Exposure to information technology and its relation to burnout. Behavior and Infor mation Technology, 19, 5, 385-392.
• Scott, W.R. (1992). Organizations : Rational, natural, and open systems . Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
• Sitter. L.U.; Hertog, J.F. y Dankbaar, B. (1997). From Complex Organizations with Simple Jobs to Simple Organizations with Complex Jobs. Human Relations , 50(5), 497-534.
• Slappendel, C. (1996). Perspectives on Innovation in Organizations. Organizational Studies, 17(1), 107-129.
• Staw, B.M. (1990). An evolutionary approach to creativity and innovation. En West, M.A. y Farr, J.L. (Eds.), Innovation and Creativity at work. Psychological and Organizational Strategies (287-308). Chichestey: Willey.
• Steyaert, C. y Bowen, R. (1996). Conversational Construction of New Meaning Configurations in Organizational Innovation: A Generative Approach. European Journal and Organizational Psychology, 5(1), 67-89.
• Stymne, B. (1989). Teknologisk deter minism. En Lowstedt, J. (Ed.), Oganisation och tekniforandring. Lund: Student Literature.
• Swan, J.A. (1995). Exploring Knowledge and Cognitions in Decisions About Technological Innovation: Mapping Managerial Cognitions. Human Relations , 48(11), 1241-1270.
• Synon, G. y Clegg, C.W. (1991). Tech- nology-led change: A study of the implementation of CADCAM. Journal of Occu pational Psychology, 64, 273-290.
• Tornatsky, L.G.; Eveland, J.D.; Boylan, M.G.; Hetzner, W.A.; Johnson, E.C.; Roitman, D. y schneider, J. (1983). The pro cess of technological innovation: Revie wing the literature . Productivity Improvement Research Section, Division of Industrial Science and Technological Innovation, National Science Foundation.
• Trist, E.L.; Higgin, G.W.; Murray, H. y Pollock, A.B. (1963). O r g a n i z a t i o n a l Choice. Londres: Tavistock Publications.
• Tushman, M.L. y Rosenkopf, L. (1992). Organizational determinants of technologi- cal change: toward a sociology of technological evolution. En Staw, B.M. y Cummings, L.L. (Eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior, vol. 14 (311- 347). Greenwich, CT.: JAI Press.
• Van de Ven, A.H. (1986). Central problems in the management of innovation. Management Science, 32590-607.
• Van de Ven, A.H. y Rogers, E.M. (1988). Innovations and Organizations. Communication Research, 15(5), 632-651.
• Van de Ven, A.H., Angle, H.L. y Poole, M.S. (1989), Research on the Management of Innovation: The Minnesota Studies . New York: Harper & Row.
• Weick, K.E. (1990). Technology as equivoque: sensemaking in new technologies. En Goodman P.S. y Sproull, L. (Eds), Technology and Organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
• Weick, K.E. y Quinn, R.E. (1999). Organizational change and development. Annual Review Psychology, 50, 361-386.
• West, M.A. y Altink, W.M.M. (1996) . Innovation at work: Individual, Group, Organizational, and Socio-historical Perspectives. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 5(1), 3-11.
• West, M.A. y Farr, J.L. (1990). Innovation at Work. En West, M.A. y Farr, J.L. (Eds.), Innovation and Creativity at work. Psychological and Organizational Strate gies (3-13). Chichestey: Willey.
• Wilson, J.Q. (1966). Innovation in Organization: Notes Toward a Theory. En Thompson, J.D. (Ed), Approaches to orga nizational design (193-218). Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
• Winner, L. (1977). Autonomous Tech nology: Technics Out of Control as a theme in political thought. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
• Wolfe, R.A. (1994). Organizational Innovation: Review, Critique and Suggested Research Directions. Journal of Mana gement Studies, 31(3), 405-431.
• Zaltman, G.; Duncan, R. y Holbek, J. (1973). Innovations and Organizations. New York: Willey.
• Zmud, R.W. (1984). An examination of "push-pull" theory applied to process innovation in knowledge work. Management Science, 30, 727-738.