Discapacidad, actividad física y saludmodelos conceptuales e implicaciones prácticas

  1. Monforte, Javier 1
  2. Devís-Devís, José 1
  3. Úbeda-Colomer, Joan 1
  1. 1 Universitat de València
    info

    Universitat de València

    Valencia, España

    ROR https://ror.org/043nxc105

Journal:
Cultura, ciencia y deporte

ISSN: 1696-5043

Year of publication: 2020

Volume: 15

Issue: 45

Pages: 401-410

Type: Article

DOI: 10.12800/CCD.V15I45.1517 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

More publications in: Cultura, ciencia y deporte

Abstract

Effective physical activity promotion toward improving the health of people with disabilities requires conceptual basis. Among other things, professionals need to make informed decisions about which conceptual models of disability and health they adopt, since these will have influence over how promotion programs are designed, implemented and evaluated. The present article introduces three models of disability: the medical, the social and the social relational. Their central tenets and their associated conceptions of health are umpacked. The criticisims that the medical and social models have received are also highlighted, as well as their limitations to promote physical activity. Finally, a multidimensional approach to promoting healthy lifestyles that brings together the social relational model of disability and the social ecological model of health promotion is suggested. Therefore, this article constitutes a useful resource for physical activity professionals working to enhance the health and wellbeing of people with disabilities.

Bibliographic References

  • Agiovlasitis, S., Yun, J., Jin, J., McCubbin, J. A., & Motl, R. W. (2018). Physical activity promotion for persons experiencing disability: the importance of interdisciplinary research and practice. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 35(4), 437-457.
  • Anderson, L. S., & Heyne, L. A. (2010). Physical activity for children and adults with disabilities: an issue of ‘‘amplified’’ importance. Disability and Health Journal, 3(2), 71–73.
  • Barnes, C. (1991). Disabled people in Britain and discrimination. London: Hurst and Co.
  • Berger, R. J. (2008). Disability and the dedicated wheelchair athlete: Beyond the “supercrip” critique. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 37(6), 647-678.
  • Berryman, J. W. (2010) Exercise is medicine: a historical perspective. Current Sport Medicine Reports, 9(4), 195-201.
  • Butler, J. & Fraser, N. (2000). ¿Redistribución o reconocimiento? Un debate entre marxismo y feminismo. Madrid: Traficantes de sueños.
  • Cairney, J., McGannon, K. R., & Atkinson, M. (2018). Exercise is medicine: Critical considerations in the qualitative research landscape. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 10(4), 391–399.
  • Charmaz, K. (1995). The body, identity, and self: adapting to impairment. The Sociological Quarterly, 36(4), 657-680.
  • Beltrán-Carrillo, V. J., Devís-Devís, J., & Peiró-Velert, C. (2018). The influence of body discourses on adolescents’(non) participation in physical activity. Sport, Education and Society, 23(3), 257-269.
  • Devís-Devís, J. (2014). Salutismo. En F.J. González, P.E. Fensterseifer (orgs.) Dicionário Crítico de Educaçao Física, 3a ed. (pp. 590-593). Ijuí: Unijuí.
  • Eng, J. J., & Martin Ginis, K. A. (2007). Using the Theory of Planned Behavior to predict leisure time physical activity among people with chronic kidney disease. Rehabilitation Psychology, 52(4), 435-442.
  • Finkelstein, V. (1980). Attitudes and disabled people. New York: World Rehabilitation Fund.
  • García-Fraguas, J. E. (1901). Estudios de física terapéutica. El medicamento ejercicio corporal. Zaragoza: Emilio Casañal.
  • Goodley, D. (2014). Dis/ability studies: Theorising disablism and ableism. London: Routledge.
  • Goodley, D., & Lawthom, R. (2019). Critical disability studies, Brexit and Trump: a time of neoliberal–ableism. Rethinking History, 23(2), 233-251.
  • Haegele, J. A., & Hodge, S. R. (2016). Disability Discourse: Overview and Critiques of the Medical and Social Models. Quest, 68(2), 193-206.
  • Haegele, J. A., Hodge, S. R., & Kozub, F. M. (2017). Beliefs about physical activity and sedentary behaviors of adults with visual impairments. Disability and Health Journal, 10, 571-579.
  • Hardin, B., & Hardin, M. (2004). Distorted pictures: Images of disability in physical education textbooks. Adapted physical activity quarterly, 21(4), 399-413.
  • Heath, G. W., Brownson, R. C., Kruger, J., Miles, R., Powell, K. E., & Ramsey, L. T. (2012). The effectiveness of urban design and land use and transport policies and practices to increase physical activity: A systematic review. Journal of Physical Activity and Health, 3, 55–76.
  • Hughes, B., & Paterson, K. (1997). The social model of disability and the disappearing body: towards a sociology of impairment. Disability & Society, 12(3), 325-340.
  • Izquierdo-Gómez, R. y Díaz-Cueto, M. (2017). Joven con síndrome de Down y natación recreativa: posibilidades hacia la inclusión. Revista Internacional de Medicina y Ciencias de la Actividad Física y el Deporte, 17(65), 43-62.
  • Jaarsma, E. A., Dijkstra, J. H., Geertzen, J. H., & Dekker, R. (2014). Barriers to and facilitators of sports participation for people with physical disabilities: A systematic review. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports, 24(6), 871-881.
  • Kissow, A. M. (2015). Participation in physical activity and the everyday life of people with physical disabilities: a review of the literature. Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research, 17(2), 144-166.
  • Lawson, H. A. (1992). Toward a socioecological conception of health. Quest, 44, 105-121.
  • Malcolm, D., 2017. Sport, medicine and health: the medicalization of sport?. London: Routledge.
  • Martin, J. J. (2013). Benefits and barriers to physical activity for individuals with disabilities: a social-relational model of disability perspective. Disability and Rehabilitation, 35(24), 2030-2037.
  • Martin Ginis, K. A., Ma, J. K., Latimer-Cheung, A. E., & Rimmer, J. H. (2016). A systematic review of review articles addressing factors related to physical activity participation among children and adults with physical disabilities. Health Psychology Review, 10(4), 478-494.
  • Mascarinas, A., & Blauwet, C. (2018). Policy and advocacy initiatives to promote the benefits of sports participation for individuals with disability. In De Luigi A. J. (Ed.), Adaptive Sports Medicine (pp. 371-384). Cham: Springer.
  • McLeroy, K. R., Bibeau, D., Steckler, A., & Glanz, K. (1988). An ecological perspective on health promotion programs. Health Education Quarterly, 15, 351-377.
  • Monforte, J., Pérez-Samaniego, V., & Devís-Devís, J. (2018). The Anabasis of Patrick: travelling an allegorical narrative map of illness and disability. Psychology of Sport & Exercise, 37, 235-243.
  • Oliver, M. (1990). The politics of disablement. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
  • Oliver, M. (1996). Understanding disability: from theory to practice. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
  • Organización Mundial de la Salud. (2004). Global strategy on diet, physical activity and health. Geneva: WHO Press.
  • Papathomas, A., Williams, T. L., & Smith, B. (2015). Understanding physical activity participation in spinal cord injured populations: Three narrative types for consideration. International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-being, 10(1), 27295.
  • Patel, D. R., & Greydanus, D. E. (2010). Sport participation by physically and cognitively challenged young athletes. Pediatric Clinics of North America, 57, 795–817.
  • Pedersen, B. K., & Saltin, B. (2015). Exercise as medicine - evidence for prescribing exercise as therapy in 26 different chronic diseases. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports, 25(Suppl. 3), 1-72.
  • Pérez, J.; Reina, R., & Sanz, D. (2012). La Actividad Física Adaptada para personas con discapacidad en España: perspectivas científicas y de aplicación actual. Cultura, Ciencia y Deporte, 21(7), 213-224.
  • Perrier, M. J., Smith, B., & Latimer-Cheung, A. E. (2013). Narrative environments and the capacity of disability narratives to motivate leisure-time physical activity among individuals with spinal cord injury. Disability and Rehabilitation, 35(24), 2089-2096.
  • Quennerstedt, M. (2008). Exploring the relation between physical activity and health—a salutogenic approach to physical education. Sport, education and society, 13(3), 267-283.
  • Rhodes, R. E. (2017). The evolving understanding of physical activity behavior: A multiprocess action control approach. En A. J. Elliot (Vol. Ed.), Advances in motivation science: 4 (pp. 171–205). Cambridge, MA: Elsevier Academic Press.
  • Rhodes, R. E., McEwan, D., & Rebar, A. L. (2019). Theories of physical activity behaviour change: A history and synthesis of approaches. Psychology of Sport & Exercise, 42, 100-109.
  • Rimmer, J., & Lai, B. (2015). Framing new pathways in transformative exercise for individuals with existing and newly acquired disability. Disability and Rehabilitation, 39(2), 173-180.
  • Sallis, R. E. (2009). Exercise is medicine and physicians need to prescribe it. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 43(1), 3-4.
  • Sallis, J. F., Owen, N., & Fisher, E. (2015). Ecological models of health behavior. In K. Glanz (Ed.). Health behavior: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 43–64). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Shakespeare, T., & Watson, N. (2001). The Social Model of Disability: An Outdated Ideology? Research in Social Science and Disability, 2, 9–28.
  • Shakespeare, T. (2014). Disability Rights and Wrongs Revisited. Oxford: Routledge.
  • Shilling, C. (2008). Changing Bodies. Habit, Crisis and Creativity. London: Sage.
  • Smith, B., Kirby, N., Skinner, B., Wightman, L., Lucas, R., & Foster, C. (2019). Infographic. Physical activity for disabled adults. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 53, 335-336.
  • Smith, A. (2016). Exercise is recreation not medicine. Journal of Sport and Health Science, 5, 129–134.
  • Smith, B., & Bundon, A. (2018). Disability models: explaining and understanding disability sport in different ways. In I. Brittain, A. Beacom (eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of Paralympic Studies (pp. 15-34). London: Palgrave McMillan.
  • Smith, B., & Perrier, M. J. (2014). Disability, sport and impaired bodies. A critical approach. En R. J. Schinke & K. R. McGannon (Eds.), The psychology of sub-culture in sport and physical activity: Critical perspectives (pp. 95-106). London: Routledge.
  • Sniehotta, F. F., Araújo-Soares, V., Brown, J., Kelly, M. P., Michie, S., & West, R. (2017). Complex systems and individual-level approaches to population health: A false dichotomy? The Lancet Public Health, 2, e396–e397.
  • Stokols, D. (1992). Establishing and maintaining healthy environments. Toward a social ecology of health promotion. American Psychologist, 47(1), 6-22.
  • Thomas, C. (2004). How is disability understood? An examination of sociological approaches. Disability & Society, 19(6), 569-583.
  • Thomas, C. (2007). Sociologies of Disability and Illness. London: Palgrave.
  • Úbeda-Colomer, J., Devís-Devís, J. & Sit, C. H. P. (2019). Barriers to physical activity in university students with disabilities: differences by sociodemographic variables. Disability and Health Journal, 12(2), 278-286.
  • Úbeda-Colomer, J., Martin Ginis, K., Monforte, J., Pérez-Samaniego, V. & Devís-Devís, J. (2019). Predicting physical activity in university students with disabilities: the role of social ecological barriers in the Theory of Planned Behaviour. Disability and Health Journal, 12(4), 574-580.
  • Úbeda-Colomer, J., Monforte, J., Campos, J., Llopis, R., Torregrosa, M. A., & Devís-Devís, J. (2018). Motivos de práctica y abandono físico-deportivo en alumnado universitario con discapacidad: influencia de la edad y el grado de discapacidad. Cultura, Ciencia y Deporte, 13(37), 51-60.
  • Vasudevan, V., Rimmer, J. H., & Kviz, F. (2015). Development of the Barriers to Physical Activity Questionnaire for People with Mobility Impairments. Disability and Health Journal, 8(4), 547-556.
Data source: Dialnet